Skip to main content

Log In


 

 

Featured Products

Arm Chairs

Haven Armchairs

Firepit

Outdoor Fireplace

News

We keep you up to date on current events affecting lakefront owners.  Read our latest articles about lakefront owner's making news.

Why Choose Us?

Why choose us?  You will not find a better selection anywhere of lake property products anywhere online.  We are simply the best. 

Advertisement

Advertise Your Product With Us. Contact Us

In The News

Coast Guard Takes Aim & Fires

In 2004, the Coast Guard on the five Great Lakes started mounting machine guns on their cutters and some of their smaller boats in an effort to fight terrorism, immigration and human smuggling. No one seemed to take objection with it until January of 2006 when they started live fire training. There have been multiple concerns raised. The Coast Guard has responded to the concerns by temporarily stopping its training sessions to give those interested a chance to voice their opinions and concerns. They are currently holding a series of 9 public hearings all to be held prior to November 13th, 2006 to solicit input from those concerned. If you cannot attend one of the meetings, you can contribute your thoughts online through the Coast Guard’s comment section of their website at www.uscgd9safetyzones.com. The website also offers other information about the training program.

Since January of 2006, the Coast Guard had held 24 live training sessions on the lakes. They mounted M240B machine guns and plan to test 2-3 times a year in 70 mile square areas known as “safety zones”. They propose to have 34 safety zones. Boaters will be restricted from using the safety zones only during fire training. Because the Great Lakes represents the largest open border of the United States (approximately 95,000 miles), making efforts to protect our US border is essential for various reasons. The armed boats are not designated as naval forces, but as “law enforcement vessels” operating under the Department of Homeland Security. All five Great Lakes will be involved: Lake Michigan, Lake Erie, Lake Huron, Lake Superior, and Lake Ontario.

The United States and Canada have reinterpreted the Rush-Bagot treaty which was signed between Britain, (now Canada) and the United States in 1817 after the war of 1812. In 1817, both sides agreed to limit fire arms. In 2004, Canada and the United States agreed that US Coast Guard vessels would once again carry fire arms to protect national security and it would not violate the Rush-Bagot Treaty. More about the Rush-Bagot Treaty can also be found on the Coast Guard's website at www.uscgd9safetyzones.com.

There are many concerns that have been raised from the property owners on the lake, the general public, environmental groups and businesses that rely on the Great Lakes. They are as follows:

First, the Coast Guard and the Department of Homeland Security made a huge blunder when they did not initially publicize their plans to carry out these training sessions. As a result, lakeshore property owners were not aware in advance that there would be live fire training sessions only 5 miles from their shore and neither were local government officials. This has caused outrage amongst some of the local residents. Lakeshore property owners (and the public) certainly have a right to know about this sort of activity prior to it taking place, not after.

Some environmentalists groups raise concerns that the amount of lead from the spent bullets that will remain at the bottom of the lake will be numerous. They claim it will be harmful to the aquatic environment and poison aquatic species. Some also claim it could be transferred to humans from the fish that we eat. While others say that it is not harmful to the food chain unless it is ingested by aquatic species.

The most obvious concern of course, is safety related. It may be possible that an uninformed boater would enter a safety zone during a training exercise. However, the Coast Guard claims a spotter boat will be assigned during training and radar will certainly pick up any other boats in the area.

The vast majority of proposed safety zones are located only 5 miles from shore. The proximity of fire training that close to the shore is also a concern to lakeshore property owners on those lakes. Local fishing charters claim the safety zones are located on some of the best fishing areas and will hinder their business.

Canada has also now expressed concerns about safety and the environment and is watching the debate closely. The US and Canada will give official comments after the November hearings have been held.